Process of Shredding

I wanted to record the process of creating the shredding. I think that because the process is so important to the works subject, I wanted to share the time which each A4 sheet of paper takes to process. Although these are incomplete clips showing the different processes, rather that the full start to finish for one page, It can give an idea of the laborious nature of the production of my work. Hopefully when viewing the piece, the scale might allow the viewer to be shocked with the work which must have gone into the piece’s production.

 

 

‘Absorbing light’

I recently visited Idris Khan’s Exhibition at the Victoria Miro Gallery, initially interested in the minimalist influence of his work (which felt related to my practise). I later found out when researching before my visit that his work explored the physiological influence of being detained on an individual.

Much of Khan’s work deals with metaphysical and aesthetic questions, using layering and repetition. He has employed the use of both sculpture and painting/ layered 2D work to explore how we recall mass, space and volume when placed in situations where our senses are limited/ fragmented.  I have been similarly interested in the concealment of imagery, focusing more on the obvious removal of information.

‘The Pain of Others’
2017
Idris Khan
‘The Pain of Others’
2017
Idris Khan

However, when moving around the exhibition space, it wasnt until closer inspection that I realised the inclusion of text within his large black wall painting work. The language of prisoners had be concealed to the extent that only singular words could be made out. I found that this build up of information concealing the very information included was an idea which I haven’t explored yet in my own practise. I think its conceptually very interesting to present a viewer with the information they need/ should know but the quantity is what holds them back from being able to digest it. I am exploring this through the shredding of numerous documents and images which will no longer be digestible on the scale their presented.

Strips and Squares

I started to explore the visual capacity for information to be understood but seriously controlled when shredding paper documents. I’ve found that some interesting works can be caught up in the sections such as ‘Labor’ which can be seen in this piece.

I have been looking at collecting information from Government organisation documents such as the International Labour Organisation, articles written on different countries using forced labour throughout the world and images taken directly from those situations. Although the piece with i display will not explicitly show the imagery and information, the eeriness of those situations should stay with the work. I need to inform the viewer of the contents which has been shredded so the knowledge of that can infiltrate how they view the shredding.

I think I want to explore how dissection can impact the viewers perception of the information stored on the original document. Somehow the content is controlled, we aren’t allowed/ mean to see what its discussing but we can understand snippets of this. I think it would be hard, however, in a gallery setting, to understand form the physical shredding (rather than a clear image such as the one below) what any of the written text or images were discussing. We generally would scan over the shredding and conclude we understand thats all it is- Shredding! I doubt that without any prompting the viewer with investigate the contents of the  documents and images therefore I need to consider how I display my work.

I also feel that the work’s conceptual content is firmly embedded in the process of creation. All the squares and strips of paper have been shredded by hand. I hope that the quantity which I create will be dramatic enough for the viewer to be shocked by the labour which will have been involved in the piece of work.

 

‘Documents Shredded’
2017
Ruth Linnell

Shredding

I started to explore how I could move forward from applying dissected materials onto the surface of a piece to a more subtle form of destroying or concealing the imagery of a photograph. I looked into the shredding of documents as a secular means of destroying information. The regimented format of this pulp when processed is very controlled and I became interested with the idea of introducing the time consuming laborious nature of my work by possibly directing and cutting down images myself as a way of commenting on a process which might be motioned by someone working under forced conditions.

Documentary Photography
Ruth Linnell
Documentary Photography
Ruth Linnell

When experimenting with the manual shredding I discovered that the process was going to take significantly longer than I had previously expected – which obviously is a part of the piece’s nature, however, with the show only a week away I’m becoming worried I won’t have the time to complete my work.

Sketchbook Work by Ruth Linnell

Things I need to consider:

  • Am I happy with manually cutting all images when they won’t nescisarily be all the same size and to the standard which might be enforced if they were in a Labour camp.
  • Would I be more effective if I were to use a machine to shred the info on a scale could be more impactful than the manual shredding as time constraints might mean I can’t shred as many images as I would want?
  • Could I increase the volume of information by considering including written info such as documents and articles which have been written and including these so not just images of forced labour which I’m exposing?
  • The manually cut images seem a lot flatter than those which have been cut on machine so their volume is significantly less than manufacture and therefore will take more time to create a large volume.
  • Do I want to present the work in sacks in the middle of the space? Or would presenting the shreddings against the wall or on the floor be more effective in people seeing the work?
  • Do they need to see the images at all? Or is it more about the concept- if so I could include whatever images I wanted which weren’t related and no one would know? Does this matter? 

I think it’s important to make sure that the work is genuine even when they can’t see the images or text. I think I could consider changing the format as time is restrictive.  I either go for scale and quantity being the most important by using a machine to shred the work or I think about presenting manually shredded images against the walls by gluing directly onto it in circular and irregular forms as I have done in my sketch book presentations.

The Black Arts Movement and Their Legacy

‘Soul of a Nation’ and ‘The place is Here’ have looked at the Black Arts Movements. They discuss contemporary politics but the context that these exhibitions were conceived in were very different to the time there displayed in. Issues around rights and equality are so current now, theses exhibitions were thought of discussing things of the past but now (considering Trump administration) they are very current.

Post-Colonialism

‘Post’ doesn’t mean simply after, but states something in the conditions of colonisation have changed. They haven’t disappeared but have simply moved forward. The 1960’s had a lot of decolonisation and the context for this was the civil rights movement, sexual equality, rise of feminism which made it a very active period of time. This coincided with American Black Arts moment, however, this happened over a decade later in England.

DIASPORA

dispersedia ‘across’+ speirein ‘scatter’ the dispersion or spread of any people from their original homeland

Many people came into England after the second world war as needed workers. The first group of artist from post colonies were interested in modernist movements. There was an idea that modernism was an international movement. There was an idea that abstract language was universal. So the early migrant artists came to the UK to join the modernist movement in England as abstract sculptures and painters but their reception was that they were alien – theses artists  (such as Frank Bowling) were disillusioned.

‘Who’s Afraid of Barney Newman’
1968
Frank Bowling

1989 ‘Magicians de la terre’ and ‘the other story’ were two Exhibitions which were concerned with the lack of non-white and western practises at that time. They devided between 50 western artists and 50 from ‘non’ west.

Jean Fisher’s essay ‘the other story and the passing perfect’ discsusses the differeneces and simialirites between the two exibitions. She says the curation of the ‘Magicians de la terre’ directed the exhibition into two fragments; western modern artists and the non-western ‘traditional’ artists. The curation told a story of modernist art being contaminated when non-western artists were creating work – they weren’t seen as being authentically from the culture, which was being criticised by Fisher. The show featured western artists such as Jeff Wall and Claes Oldenburg / Coosje Van Bruggen, next to the traditions which separated the ‘other’ in art works such as Jangarh Singh Shya’s traditionalist Indian painting.

‘The Storyteller’
1988
Jeff Wall
‘Untitled’
1989
Jangarh Singh Shyam

Fisher argued that artists such as Ali Wei Wei wouldn’t be shown as wasn’t seen as purely traditional – he’s a modernist. Contemporary artists were being categorised negatively as not being ‘truelyl authentic’ to their country. But Fisher says the ‘other story’ was discussing modernist artists who weren’t from west and placing their experimentation alongside wester artists. He said in his book ‘The Other Story and the Past Imperfect’ that:

Contact between Europe and its ‘others’ produced transformations in both directions, leading to a plurality of modernities and modernisms, each with its local inflections… Cross-cultural encounters are perceived as central to the formation of modernism, not supplementary… both in the formal break with pictorial conventions and in the development of the ‘expressionist’ strand of modernism that began with ‘primitivism“- Jean Fisher ‘The Other Story and the Past Imperfect’, p. 2-3

If we want to have a global understanding of art history we have to look outside of western understanding. The west doesn’t automatically operate as the centrt against which everything else gets measured. There is so much depth to the resources which artists have used to create these movements.

An example of this is when Van Gogh literally copied Hiroshige’s ‘Sudden Shower Over Shin-Ohashi Bridge and Atake’ when creating his work ‘Bridge in the Rain’. His work later became vital to post impressionist specifically exploring the flattening of images. However, the influence from this moment was originated in Japanese art.  However, these movements are seen as ‘European’ so when artists outside of the west start playing with these themes their work and them as individuals/ artist have been condemned by critiques and the wider market.

‘Bridge in the Rain’ (after Hiroshige)
1887
Vincent Van Gogh
‘Sudden Shower Over (Shin-Ohashi Bridge and Atake)’
1857
Hiroshige

Second Wave Black Arts Movements

In the 1980’s in England, the use of name ‘black’ was used to bring together diverse groups who wouldn’t usually unify but being brought against the white culture. They were being treated as ‘other’ or alienated. It was strategic but also dangerous as it emphasises difference. The significance of a difference was being brought into question politically as separating them.

We see the recent acceptance of non-wester artists working in contemporary mediums through these four Artists:

  1. Rasheed Araeen– Frist generation artist from Pakistan started making minimalist scuptural as she first moved to England. Through time work becomes more political and is active as an individual working as a curator, writer, editior, set up magazine.

    ‘Burning Ties’
    1976-79
    Rasheed Araeen
  2. Mona Hatoum From Lebanon performance piece. The doc martins as national from skin heads and polic were using docs as shoes so had important significace. They acted as a shadow or a lurking presense. They disturb her capacity to walk naturally so she cannot walk innosently and purely.
    Performance Still (Roadworks exhibition Brixton)
    1985
    Mona Hatoum

    Performance Still (Roadworks exhibition Brixton)
    1985
    Mona Hatoum
  3. Black Audio Film Collective John Akomfrah makde film, gernally known now as ‘film essay’ moving between documentary and also contemporary. During there work together they organised film screening through out London in order to produces exposure of topics which aren’t gernally discussed. Archival footage becomes a fragment of the time the film was made. So they used factual and poet work by looking at documentation along with voice overs and sound to changed the time and interpretation.

    ‘The Unfinished Conversation’
    2012
    John Akomfrah
  4. Sonia Boyce looks at the tension of generational difficulties as her parents were involved in chritistianity but her second generation are more associated with the Rastafarian religion, which starts to go against her parental ties. It deals with complexities of who and what one identifies with. Iconography – images are  a language of signs which carry a series of meanings outside of the painting itself. She looks at self portraiture and looks at how to present her self when the image she’s dealing with has socially negative connotations.

    ‘Missionary Position II’
    1985
    Sonia Boyce

Of the back of Boyce’s exploration of self through portraiture allows us to explore the different between ‘Identity Politics’ and the ‘Politics of identity’. Whilst the former implies that one knows who one is, the latter looks at when identity is thrown into question. They start to discuss: what am I? This topic of subjectivity is started to be discussed as a problem by boyce.

‘From Tarzan to Rambo- English Born ‘Native’ Considers her Relationship to the Constructed/Self Image and her Roots in Reconstruction’
1987
Sonia Boyce

Identity might be what we are pre-given but Identification might be things through which we choose. If the identification Boyce has placed on her and reflected back to her is negative, how do you deal with this? Culture is placing images onto her which are hard to deal with such as expectations on the topics within the art felid which she ‘should’ be dealing with.

 

Richard Wilson

When researching into the work of Gordon Matta-Clarke, I became particularly interested in Wilsons work when I first looked at his piece ‘Turning the place over’, which featured a circular segment of a wall rotating and detaching itself from the building. The work is obviously very structurally challenging to achieve but I think there is a playfulness which we don’t encounter in our everyday situations which I really enjoy about the work. Theres coming very humorous about cutting sections from buildings, when It seems so natural to cut sculpture and paper and canvas, when their subject is architecture and they treat it in the same way as something more malleable, we have to deconstruct our understanding of a building as a functioning space when viewing the work.

‘Turning the place over’
By Richard Wilson

I later realised I had seen his work in situ when around Holborn. His piece ‘Square the block’ I had discussed with my friend, unaware at the time weather it was art or an accident. We looked at the structure and experienced the piece as interaction with art in an unexpected format and location. Taking this from a context where we expect to see interventions into the everyday was really interesting to me. The forced destruction of the building wasn’t as impressive as I feel the photo displays. They joinery showed that the ‘falling’ bricks were mounted onto the surface of the wall rather than a part of the construction which I felt was a shame as it made it more obvious that this was Art and not a structure which at any moment could fall down.

‘Square the block’
Richard Wilson

Wilson’s work always referenced the existing architectural context and said: “Whenever I start a piece of work I start the process by trying to understand the particular nature of the site and the reason for making the work. For me that’s the springboard that starts me towards an idea.”

I also have become interested in his work collaboratively with the RA ‘Hang on a minute lads… I’ve got a great idea’. The work, based on ‘the Italian Job’ movie, consider of a replicated bus canter-levering over one of Hong Kong’s most iconic Grade 1 Listed Facades to a Hotel. This work really brings into question were the sculpture ends and architecture starts, blurring the lines between the two. Although this has moved away from my initial interest in his work for the destructive construction of buildings as sculpture – which I aimed to translate into photographical manipulation- I have found that his work creates an interesting conversation between boundaries of art. Encountering his work in the everyday forces us to consider its creation but question its origin.

‘Hang on a minute lads… I’ve got an idea’
2015
Richard Wilson

Bibliography:

Please see: Gorden Matta-Clarke

‘Hidden Behind’

I started to consider how I come move away from the direct photographic manipulation by looking at the application of materials onto the surface of a photograph to conceal whats behind. I started with my initial experimentation with wood as seen in ‘Time consuming Labour’. I found by cutting vertical dissection of wood and placing them over the surface of the image I not only controlled the view but also referenced the blockaded viewpoint you might receive from being behind bars.

However, moving forwards I wanted to look more at the ‘process’ of creation becoming the conceptual driving force behind the work. I started to use materials which came in a singular dense form such as a foam board and a polystyrene board and dissect these into their segments. When working on the black foam board, I pulled apart its structure to collect sections of fluff which were no larger than by pinky nail, using destruction as a form of processing. The idea is that the time which this has taken me to do would be representative of the repetitive nature of forced labour which happens within detention camps.

The concealment of the image behind the medium which I have applied to the surface of the imagery also comments to the common concealment of forced labour as an issue occurring in detainment environment. I wanted the work to be counter intuitive in that rather than revealing the truth, the work conceals in a form which makes the act of concealing ‘exposed’.

‘Hidden Behind’
2017
Ruth Linnell

The process of creating the work took be two solid days and resulted in sever cramp in my hands. I did, however, feel that the image which I chose to use underneath the imagery didn’t reflect the possibilities which I could have pushed the work to conceptually. I feel that in future, I would want to used more weighted photography which has been taken from within detention camps. I do think it worked having the three pieces next to each other as the central image was able to give away more of the content. However, I feel I need to respond to my crit feedback and actively attempt not to hold onto the representational when showing my work as it sometimes prevents the viewer from creating their own ideas.

I think I do need to consider weather its important for the viewer to have an understanding of the time the work has taken even if this functioned as the time written on the wall next to the work. This could suggest the manual work of the piece whilst not giving away all of the subject matter in an explicit way.

Please see: Time Consuming labour

Gorden Matta-Clarke

I started to research into the work of Gordon Matta-Clarke as my practise has become more destructive in nature. His exhibition ‘Anarchitect’ at the Bronx museum Looks at the manipulation of urban architecture through the means of physically meticulous removal of shapes and sections, sculpting the building. He has been known to cut out wholes through buildings which are soon to be demolished.

‘Splitting’
1974
Gordon Matta-Clarke

Having lived in New York, Paris and Chilli as well as studying Architecture, Matta-Clarke became a voice in rejecting the commodification of art, with his sculptures coming in the form of ‘large scale interventions into exciting architecture’. These temporary works which consider of sections of buildings being completely removed were documented through film and photography.

Matta-Clarke also ended up displaying the corners of the house roof which he saw away form the house in New Jersey which he saw in two. These roof corners where then displayed in John Gibson Gallery in New York, which to be is an interesting relationship between the rumour of the work becoming the piece and its memory, vs the sculptural element. The reclaimed corners which now sit in a gallery are a bridge to the event which occurred but also sit as objects in their own right.

‘Splitting: Four Corners’, 1974
Gorden Matta-Clarke

Matta-Clarke echoed his enjoyment of manipulation through cutting photographical work. He made a point to destruct the negatives of his films before development. This reflects the practise I’ve developed of photographic manipulation and the concealment of information in a two dimensional form rather than sculpturally as done in the Anarchitect works.

For the Biennale de Paris 1975 Matta-Clarke created ‘Conical Intersect’ by cutting a large cone-shaped hole through two seventeenth-century townhouses due for demolition. This created a shift in the controversy of the time as the Centre Georges Pompidou was being propositioned for the site so he decided to create a completely different event which had its own public interest rather than participating in the running commentary on the Pompidou centre. I think its an interesting approach to art, moving towards the way in which Francis Alÿs works, where the piece revolves around the participation through conversation of the public. It shifts the focus form the action to the reception.

‘Conical Intersect’, 1975
By Gordon Matta Clarke

Bibliography:

Please see: Unit 1 Recorded Tutorial Feedback